Showing posts with label hedge fund letter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hedge fund letter. Show all posts

5.16.2011

Favorite Quotes from Q1 Hedge Fund Letters: Passport, Kleinheinz Capita, and Omega

One of the most fascinating aspects of the investment business is manager commentary in the form of hedge fund letters. Sometimes these letters take the form of an aggressive rant, or a "teach-in" session of some strategy the fund is employing (see: Michael Burry @ Scion), or simply a commentary on what's keeping the hedge fund manager up at night. I try to read as many of these letters as possible (hint: send me more letters). I also believe in a post-Madoff world, increased disclosure of underlying investments can generate investment ideas for your own portfolio.


Over the past few months, I've received a number of letters from readers. After the litany of 13Fs coming out today, I thought it would be productive to pull out a sentence of two from a number of prominent hedge fund managers' letter that I particularly found insightful. I have split this post into two individual posts with the second one coming later in the week.

Kleinheinz Capital Partners, a legend fund in the hedge community (26.1% annualized returns over 182 months...you can read more about them here) wrote:
"In summary, while the near-term case for uranium equities has been significantly weakened as investors take a wait-and-see approach, we believe that in the long-term nuclear power will provide as essential component of the world's energy consumption. Therefore, the Fukushima accident is unlikely to cut short the nuclear power growth story the way Chernobyl did twenty-five years ago, because even in the worst case scenario Fukushima would remain a narrowly localized problem with limited radiation beyond the immediate area surrounding the plant. Additionally, twenty-five years ago, growth in nuclear power was driven mostly by societies in Western Europe and North America, while future growth is expected to come from emerging markets such as China, which has a more centralized decision making process and a very large population with rapidly growing needs for electricity. China, Russia, India, and South Korea account for about 75% of the projected nuclear build-out and those countries have a constructive view on nuclear power."
I spoke with a number of brilliant analysts after the Fukushima accident and the smarter ones of the group started doing their work on the various uranium producers. If you look at the charts of many of these companies, they've traded down hard to the point of a significant discount to NAV (the spot market for the actual underlying commodity is actually fairly tight right now). Names include Berkeley, Denison, Cameco, ERA, Extract, Paladin Energy, Ur-Energy, Uranium Energy, and Uranium One. I think here you go for a low cost producer with an unlevered balance sheet trading at or below NAV.

Omega Advisors, founded by "The Doctor" Leon Cooperman, wrote in his quarterly letter:
"Equity-market valuation is attractive. However, valuation by itself does not bring higher share prices. We are all aware of, and have experienced, value traps. There almost always needs to be a catalyst to activate market undervaluation. We are constructive on U.S. shares because we believe that there are several important, significant, and long-lasting catalysts to activate share undervaluation. These catalysts include:
  • A self-sustaining U.S. economic expansion that should last at least as long as the average post-war expansion of 60 months.
  • An economic and inflation cycle characterized by a low level of volatility.
  • A very sweet profit cycle.
  • A significant allocation shift to equities from fixed income by individual and institutional investors."
I always have enjoyed Leon Cooperman's commentary both in his quarterly / annual letters and his appearances and conferences and on CNBC. The letters particular are stocked with charts and graphs that really back the fund's investment positioning. While I am not as bullish as Omega on the overall public equities markets (I believe that profit margins are characteristically too high and even with sales growth fueled by an economic expansions, profit growth will be less than analysts' estimates), I 100% agree with point 4 above. I saw a statistics of the amount of equities, as a % of net worth that people under 40 have, and it's staggeringly low. Further, once inflation rears its ugly heads, fixed income investors will realize that past performance, i.e. a 25 year bond bull market, does not guarantee future returns.

Passport Capital, led by John Burbank, had a fascinating disclosure on the purchase of a Chinese Renminbi (RMB) non-deliverable forward contract:
"We believe that the RMB will continue to appreciate at a mid to high single-digit rate each year for the foreseeable future. To maintain Beijing's target for growth, acceptable levels of inflation, and to prevent an excessive correction of home prices, we believe China must develop independent monetary policy. Over the long run and as evidenced by their recently released five-year plan, China intends to rebalance its economy from export to consumption. This should drastically reduce China's trade surplus, as suggested by Yi Gang of the People's Bank of China in October 2010. Gradual appreciation of the RMB helps China move judiciously in that direction."
The letter goes on to note that the fund estimates that the break-even for the position is 8% from entry over the next two years and a 11% move (5% for two years...or the pre-crisis average growth rate) would net Passport a 2x reward with further upside.

This sort of trade as well as another fascinating one disclosed in the letter (adding aggressively to their Saudi portfolio during late February), as well as other commentary from John Burbank and his team that these guys understand value in a global context and position the fund to capture the upside while minimizing the downside. I learn more about the global economy each time I read one of Passport's letters.

Later in the week we will post the second part of the series of Q1 hedge fund letters. If you have any letters you would like to share, please send them to hunter [at] distressed-debt-investing.com

Read more...

2.22.2011

Greenstone Value Opportunity Fund Annual Letter

About a year ago, we did one of our first emerging manager interviews with the team at Greenstone Value Opportunity Fund. Notably, one of their largest positions at the time was Tronox, which was a moonshot (both the debt and equity) in the last few months of the year:



Last week, I received Greenstone's annual letter for 2010, which I've pasted in full below.


From my read, it looks like a pretty strong year for the team, maintaining a massive out performance versus the averages since inception. Here are some of my favorite quotes from the letter:
  • "The valuation criteria we are primarily concerned with have not changed: low multiples of free cash flow and/or EBITDA across the business cycle. When we say low multiples, we are looking for companies trading at less than 3-5x these multiples. In elevated markets we find that we have to search harder to find the multiples we are comfortable with, or we have to be more patient in letting the market come to us"
  • "Within the fund, we have been consistently trimming back our winners on the long side, while adding to our short exposure in an effort to lower the overall net long exposure as the markets have trudged higher. We are also sitting on a fairly healthy cash position. However, we’re very conscious of the fact that we can’t sit still praying for any particular bearish or bullish move to play out just because our portfolio is positioned to such a thesis. It is our job to continue to search for value no matter where the indices are trading, and to decide how much we wish to expose ourselves to an elevated market. We will continue to selectively add to our long book as we uncover mispriced opportunities, but it’s not our game to be climbing into bed just because everyone else is piling in." - (Editor's Note: My emphasis added. And stealing that one for when MBA students around the globe come to visit to hear my wit and wisdom)
  • "We currently have no credits, distressed or otherwise in the portfolio. As of mid January we are looking at one post emerging equity. While the valuation fits our criteria, finding a seller is proving difficult. We are always looking at the opportunity to invest higher in the cap structure when the upside/downside opportunity is compelling, and when we can emulate the same deep value focus on low multiples of free cash flow and tangible assets that we use in selecting long equities." - (Editor's Note: I've begged them to tell me the name, but their lips are sealed until they establish a full position. Here's hoping we can report on it when we get next quarter's letter. Nonetheless, like a lot of smart people, the team does not see much value in credit)
As always, if you come across an interesting letter to investors, please send it my way. All submissions are 100% confidential and I will never post a letter without getting the original author's permission.

Read more...

10.19.2010

Hedge Fund Letter: Greenstone Value Fund

A few months ago, we did an exclusive interview with hedge fund managers Chris White and Tim Stobaugh of the Greenstone Value Fund. See below for their 3rd quarter letter. My favorite quote:


Investors have flip-flopped dramatically, from a fearful and anxious little boy one minute (August) to an exuberant girl skipping through the fields without care the next minute (September). Even the financial press has coined a new phrase to describe the market action: risk on/risk off. In other words, like flipping a light switch, investors either want risky assets (stocks, risk on), or they don’t (fixed income, risk off).

Enjoy the letter! And for those with interesting hedge fund letters, please send them my way - Your identity will be never be revealed (coming from the Zorro of the blogosphere - that has to mean something right?)



Read more...

8.31.2010

Third Point 2Q 2010 Letter

In the past, we have discussed Dan Loeb's hedge fund: Third Point. I have always enjoyed Loeb's commentary on the market and certain distressed debt positions (a place I know they enjoy to play). Below you will find their most recent letter, and below that some commentary from me. Enjoy!



Hunter Commentary
  • Wow. Blames the market pullback on Goldman Sachs (disclosure: I am long the equity - actually bought it the day after the SEC investigation was announced). You know what: I tend to partially agree with this - It definitely left jitters in the market - I get daily runs from BNP with the title "CDS: Where we are since the GS annoyance" (see below). That being said, I do think the market ran way too hard into April and we were do for a pullback, no matter the catalyst.

  • Agree with his point about spreading the "punitive" costs across the general population. The card program is just one example - The health care bill is of course the prime example.
  • As many money managers have pointed out, its hard to invest when the rules are changing nearly EVERY SINGLE DAY.
  • Commentary on corporate boards: Spot on. 8 times out of 10 I am disgusted when I read XYZ company's proxy.
  • Third Point was short the for-profit education sector that has gotten annihilated recently.
  • Lowest gross and net exposure since March 2009. Looking for ideas with hard catalysts (think emergence from bankruptcy...)
  • Put in place some Baupost like 'blow up' hedges
  • "...the sidelines is perhaps the most 'crowded trade.'" I have never thought about it like that but he is spot on
  • Significant positions in post-reorg equities hurt performance during the quarter - still has "high convictions" in the names
  • As he notes beautifully in the letter, post-reorg equities are sometimes referred to as "roach motels" - i.e. easy to get in and impossible to get out.
  • Incredible discussion on REMICs and Re-REMICS, a place we are also invested. Something everyone should read. The upside/downside of the Alt A trades have been spectacular.
As always, an incredible read from Dan Loeb.

Read more...

4.26.2010

Hedge Fund Commentary

Every now and then I stumble upon a letter from an investment advisor/hedge fund that I enjoy reading and decide to share with readers. This letter below, from Downtown Associates has some great words of wisdom. My favorite:

We will not “chase” performance – when stocks are expensive the ensuing returns are likely to be subpar. Instead we prefer to hold cash, remain liquid and wait for attractive opportunities. Why should today’s opportunity set be the only one we consider when tomorrow’s is likely to be more fertile? By remaining disciplined in our purchase decisions, we seek to maximize future returns while limiting our downside risk (the possibility of a permanent loss of investment capital).

We prefer the risk of lost opportunity to the risk of lost capital.
Enjoy! And if you have any letter or commentary you think I would find interesting to share with our readers, please email me at hunter [at] distressed-debt-investing [dot] com

Read more...

2.18.2010

Two hedge fund letters worth reading

I am a big fan of reading hedge fund letters, especially those written by Julian Robertson's Tiger Cubs. Dealbreaker published Lee Ainslie's Maverick Capital 2009 Annual letter last week which can be found here: Maverick Capital 2009 Annual Letter.


In addition, you can read David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital 2009 Annual letter (another investor I truly look upto) here: Greenlight Capital 2009 Annual Letter.

Read more...

2.09.2010

Perry Capital's 2010 Letter

A few months ago, we discussed Perry Capital's 2nd quarter 2009 Letter to Investors. Last week, while our dear friend, Jay, from Market Folly, posted their 2010 Letter to Investors. I would embed it below, but as usual Jay's blogging skills far surpass mine. Some take-aways from the letter:

  • Their largest positions were in "low priced senior corporate credit in challenged industries such as auto finance and residential real estate." This is very similar to the approach of Marty Whitman's team at Third Avenue and frankly my approach as well. As the letter continues to point out, the up-side / down-side in that trade is very good when you are buying the most senior bank debt in the 60s/70s.
  • Talks about the ownership of Delphi which has been written up on the DDIC (one of the highest rated ideas on the site).
  • Perry has initiated a position in General Motor's bonds which we discussed late in January.
  • CIT, a post I know I have promised people (I'll eventually get to it), was profitable for pretty much every hedge fund under the sun in the 4th quarter.
  • The letter goes on to talk about the excessive debt situation in the corporate, commercial, and sovereign markets. I could not agree more.
  • And, along with some other funds, are suing Porsche for the VOW/PAH3 arbitrage debacle.
  • And it looks like they have a nice, big position, in Europe credit derivatives. Shorting sovereigns much? By the way, I love that trade - Klarman has spoken in the past how Baupost has bought protection on sovereign debt because the upside / downside is remarkable.
We hope to bring you more hedge fund letters and commentary in the near future at Distressed Debt Investing. We look forward to it.

Read more...

12.01.2009

Third Point's Investor Letter - Hint: They like distressed debt

Third Point Investor Letter Q3 09

Read more...

Email

hunter [at] distressed-debt-investing [dot] com

About Me

I have spent the majority of my career as a value investor. For the past 8 years, I have worked on the buy side as a distressed debt and high yield investor.